Login . Register .
Latest Trades
tan kok bengOPENSHORT$1.090UMS HOLDINGS LIMITED
Alice AliciaCLOSEDSHORT0.72%SOILBUILD BUSINESS SPACE REIT
latebird2000CLOSEDSHORT-2.80%COMFORTDELGRO CORPORATION LTD
Post Reply 
PAP lost a lot of credibility tweaking the PE.
Author Message
13-8-2017 9:01 AM
sukhoi35 Online
Senior Sheep

Posts: 1,640
Reputation: 2
13-8-2017 8:27 AMdrgn wrote  remember the case of "200m from polling station" Smile

https://publichouse.sg/is-the-ag-the-best-person-to-decide-on-election-laws/

That silly idiot wasted a lot of taxpayers $$$ sponsoring him and paid his scholarship for his o'seas education..result, good for nothing.

and OMG! he has no sense of measurement.
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
13-8-2017 9:07 AM
SmarTIndex Offline
First Class Elite

Posts: 7,939
Reputation: 7
13-8-2017 5:19 AMteaserteam wrote  Penny wise, pound foolish..

with 70% votes, they can get away with almost anything. I think with 80% support, even committing adultery can stay in power thumbs up

[Image: l160.gif]
29-12-2016 12:33 AMtalkingstocking wrote  Actually China should move its capital to Singapore!
PRC's ambition exposed!!! CCP want to abandon their polluted capital and move to Singapore
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
13-8-2017 9:12 AM
sukhoi35 Online
Senior Sheep

Posts: 1,640
Reputation: 2
13-8-2017 8:27 AMdrgn wrote  remember the case of "200m from polling station" Smile

https://publichouse.sg/is-the-ag-the-best-person-to-decide-on-election-laws/

Early sign of dementia
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
13-8-2017 9:16 AM
cestlavie Online
Sheep

Posts: 126
Reputation: 2
This is totally rubbish by the court !!

How to get into the core of the polling station without getting pass the 200m radius?? Singapore judiciary system at its best !
(This post was last modified: 13-8-2017 9:17 AM by cestlavie.)
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
13-8-2017 9:20 AM
Avatar Offline
First Class Elite

Posts: 5,207
Reputation: 4
13-8-2017 4:57 AMsgbuffett wrote  1. They did it to favor their own candidate by inventing an unconvincing argument.

2.The whole idea of PE is to find a President who is independent to check on the govt.

3. By tweaking to its own candidate, the PAP defeat the whole purpose of having PE.

4. It shows the PAP does not operate on consistent and firm principles.
That means PAP actually got tons of credibility in the first place. I think there shud be no problem to lose some creditibilty in this PE as you claimed.
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
13-8-2017 10:06 AM
Ola Offline
Senior Sheep

Posts: 1,634
Reputation: 3
13-8-2017 9:20 AMAvatar wrote  That means PAP actually got tons of credibility in the first place. I think there shud be no problem to lose some creditibilty in this PE as you claimed.

After 50 years and Mr LKY gone, does the CURRENT PaP have even half the credibility left now?

. . . . . {I love my country, does not mean I love the government party}
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
13-8-2017 10:16 AM
Avatar Offline
First Class Elite

Posts: 5,207
Reputation: 4
13-8-2017 10:06 AMOla wrote  After 50 years and Mr LKY gone, does the CURRENT PaP have even half the credibility left now?

Dunno but needs research to calculate the amount of creditibily left. I think still alot from the 70% mandate.
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
13-8-2017 10:21 AM
dumb1 Offline
Senior Sheep

Posts: 734
Reputation: 2
Stay away from the election to show we are against election based on race. I simply can't believe majority if not all mps supported the dumb proposal. They have robbed my trust.
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
13-8-2017 10:23 AM
Avatar Offline
First Class Elite

Posts: 5,207
Reputation: 4
13-8-2017 10:21 AMdumb1 wrote  Stay away from the election to show we are against election based on race. I simply can't believe majority if not all mps supported the dumb proposal. They have robbed my trust.

Must pay fine to put your name back in registry if you boycott election.
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
13-8-2017 10:29 AM
cestlavie Online
Sheep

Posts: 126
Reputation: 2
13-8-2017 10:21 AMdumb1 wrote  Stay away from the election to show we are against election based on race. I simply can't believe majority if not all mps supported the dumb proposal. They have robbed my trust.

The vast 70% still live in denial, despite being hoodwinked time and again. It is really strange in today's context whereby there are so many alternative news and info, they still have not woken to the fact that the qualities of this gov has degenerated but choose to believe the MSM, propaganda and twisted facts.
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Forum Jump:
Contact . Privacy . Rules .  RSS . Back-to-Top