URA proposes 90-day rental cap, 80% consent rule for Airbnb-type accommodation
#51
17-4-2018 8:25 AM
sgbuffett said:
having 80% rule is a bad idea..it allows majority to override genuine owners who bought to raise families.
The 80 % rule is beneficial to the families (Of course 100% would be even better for them ) as it's very difficult to be achieved.
If no such rule, then that would be detrimental to these families interest
Quote
#52
16-4-2018 8:13 PM
menghuii said:
80%? how to get it?

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/sin...e-10141664

only 90days then he remaining 270days empty leh..
Quote
#53
17-4-2018 8:50 AM
OLT said:
only 90days then he remaining 270days empty leh..
They having difficulty finding long term tenant, so can rent out temporarily while they look for long term one
Quote
#54
90 Days? Just nice for Vietnam pros and their social visit pass duration.
. . . . . {I love my country, does not mean I love the government party}
Quote
#55
It is for people with owned the building or majority of the building.
Quote
#56
I do not have high regards for Lawrence wong personally, from how he present himself in parliament to how he portrays his smiling face with a sudden change to straight face
Is very telling to be honest
Quote
#57
The ones desperate for tenants are greedy investors hoping to make a quick profit
http://slang.org/FOOK-meaning-definition
The most popular meaning of FOOK is: F uck

Vigilante uncle Placebo got to put wendy chan in her place coz he is afraid of an old, ugly [email protected] witch...scared + jealous of what?
Quote
#58
If I live in condo, I also will not support my neighbors engage in airbnb. With 80% must consent, surely no go wan.
Some more can rent out 90 days only.
Quote
Users browsing: 1 Guest(s)


Forum Jump: